GDPR brought with it new rules to better protect personal data. Not only to protect adults privacy, but also to guard children against exploitation. So what is the age of consent?
As adults we can of course make informed decisions about how our own data is collected or processed. But what about children? At what age are they expected to be able to make their own decisions? And is this reasonable or realistic?
What's the age of consent in relation to GDPR?
Under GDPR Article 8, the age of consent, i.e. when a child is required or able to give their consent for the processing of the own data, is 16. However, member states are allowed to allocate their own age of consent, with a cap at 13 years of age.
In the UK, the age of consent is 13, so the lowest age that the GDPR will allow.
Is that low enough? Or too high?
The purpose of consent is to draw a line in the sand showing from which age onwards children can provide their own consent for the processing of their personal data. We tend to generally think about children’s data being used for social media purposes, such as Instagram, which is aimed at users who are at least 13 years of age, and even has an online form to enable the reporting of account users who are younger than that.
How does GDPR age of consent differ across the EU?
Many EU member countries have the same age as the UK, with only one or two older and surprisingly some nations having no provisions at all.
- Austria - 14 years old
- Belgium - 13 years old
- Czech Republic - 15 years old
- Denmark - 13 years old
- Finland - 13 years old
- France - 15 years old (or younger with parental consent)
- Germany - None
- Hungary - None
- Ireland - 16 years old
- Italy - 14 years old
- Netherlands - 16 years old
- Poland - None
- Slovakia - 16 years old
- Spain - 14 years old
- Sweden - 13 years old
You can stay up to date on each country with the handy Two Birds GDPR Tracker.
Are children unwittingly putting their online security at risk?
Despite the regulations, the UK's Children's Commissioner say that children are unwittingly giving away rights to their private data and putting their online security at risk.
A survey undertaken by the Commissioner's Growing Up Digital taskforce revealed that nearly 50% of 8 to 11 year old's agreed to vague terms and conditions offered by social media firms.
None of the children surveyed fully understood the terms and conditions of Instagram, which is used by more than half of 12 to 15 years and 48% of 8 to 11 year old's. Only half of these 8 to 11 year old's are even able to read the terms, which run into more than 5,000 words over 17 pages of text. However, Instagram is aimed at ages 13+ and has a reporting facility for younger users.
According to Ofcom, 12 to 15 year old's spend more than 20 hours a week online and 70% of them have a social media profile. Interestingly, Ofcom also report that even 3 and 4 year old's spend 8 ¼ hours a week online - that's quite a crazy thought!
As with most adults, if I want to know anything about social media, I’ll ask a child in my family or circle of friends. There are no greater experts in the use of social media sites than children – but experts in compliance, we can tell from these statistics alone, they are not.
Can we really expect children to make informed choices about their personal data rights?
Having said that, common sense should tell us that children, even at the age of 13, cannot reasonably be expected to make informed choices about their rights relating to personal data.
The world of data protection is a minefield and filled with legal and compliance professionals who can debate the topics and intricacies of such for hours on end. Yet under GDPR, we are allowing children as young as 13 to make decisions regarding their own data protection.
The need for parental intervention
Clearly there is a need for parental intervention still, and for parents to at least provide guidance to their children in this topic. Interestingly enough, I am sure that the parents do so when it comes to financial matters, like choosing choosing whether to provide or withhold their consent on child bank accounts and trust funds.
Similarly, it will be interesting to see the direction in which financial services firms move when it comes to consenting children, who consent to receive marketing and promotional material, or who seek to restrict or withdraw consent, perhaps without any real understanding of the impact and consequences of such instructions.
Want to learn more about GDPR?
If you'd like to stay up to date with GDPR best practices, industry insights and key trends across regulatory compliance, digital learning, EdTech and RegTech news, subscribe to the Skillcast Compliance Bulletin.
To help you navigate the compliance landscape we have collated searchable glossaries of key terms and definitions across complex topics including GDPR, Equality, Financial Crime and SMCR. We also regularly report key learnings from recent GDPR fines. And if you're looking for a compliance training solution, why not visit our GDPR Course Library?.
You can follow our ongoing YouGov research into compliance issues, attitudes and risk perceptions in the UK workplace through our Compliance Insights blogs.
Last but not least, we have 60+ free compliance training aids, including assessments, best practice guides, checklists, desk-aids, eBooks, games, handouts, posters, training presentations and even e-learning modules!
If you've any questions or concerns about compliance or e-learning, please get in touch.
We are happy to help!