<img src="https://certify.alexametrics.com/atrk.gif?account=b2hlr1ah9W20em" style="display:none" height="1" width="1" alt="">

Risk Perception & Employee Misconduct Gap

Posted by

Vivek Dodd

on 15 Aug 2019

A recent Skillcast survey has highlighted the significant gap between the incidence of misconduct observed by employees at UK firms, and the risk perception of decision makers. 

Key finding

From our UK Corporate Compliance Survey in May 2019,  which covered 4,000 employees and decision makers at UK firms, we observed a significant gap between the incidence of misconduct observed by employees and the risk perception of decision makers. And notably this gap widens the larger the size of the company.

Misconduct observed by UK company employees

In survey, we asked employees at UK companies if they had witnessed any of the common acts of employee misconduct in the past twelve months. The responses (see Figure 1) revealed that:

  • The vast majority (67%) had not witnessed any act of misconduct in the workplace
  • Health & safety, and discrimination & harassment breaches were by far the most common examples of misconduct witnessed
  • Personal data & IT security breaches and fraud were cited by a tiny minority
  • Instances of money laundering, sanctions, bribery & corruption, competition law/collusion were practically insignificant

Figure1-Observed-Misconduct-All

Risk perception of UK company decision makers

To the decision makers at UK companies, we put the question slightly differently. We asked them what acts of employee misconduct they fear most in their business. The responses (see Figure 2) revealed that:

  • The risk perceptions of decision makers were a lot higher but the profile matched the risks being reported by employees
  • 40% of the decision makers reported not being at risk of employee misconduct in their business - this figure ranged between 15% at larger firms, 26% at medium sized firms and 65% at small firms
  • As with employees, Health & safety, and discrimination & harassment risks also figured highly with the decision makers
  • But, unlike employees, the decision makers have an equally high threat perception from personal data & IT security breaches and fraud
  • Decision makers perceive the risk of money laundering, sanctions, bribery & corruption, competition law/collusion to be lower but still very significant

Figure2-Risk-Perception-All-Decision-Makers

The gap between incidence and perceptions of misconduct

The above findings show that overall, decision makers have a far higher risk perception than the incidence of misconduct observed by employees (see Figure 3).

FIgure3-Perception-Vs-Incidence

The incidence of misconduct observed by employees is relatively unchanged irrespective of the company size (see Figure 4).

Figure4-Observed-Misconduct-By-Size

However, the risk perception of the decision makers is vastly different, with those at large firms significantly more worried about employee misconduct than those as smaller firms.

Figure5-Risk-Perception-By-Size

Consequently, the difference between incidence observed by employees and the risk perception of the decision makers is far wider at large and medium sized firms.

Figure6-Risk-Perception-Vs-Observed-Misconduct-Small

Figure7-Risk-Perception-Vs-Observed-Miscondut-Medium

Figure8-Risk-Perception-Vs-Observed-Misconduct-Large

Why is the gap between observation and perceptions of misconduct greater at larger companies?

This discrepancy between small, medium and large firms above is significant and based on the results of polling over 2,000 employees and 2,000 decision makers. Making sense of it though is open to conjecture. A multitude of factors could be at play. We propose two premises below and invite you to add others based on your own experience.

  1. Decision makers at smaller firms feel more in control of the actions of their employees and hence their risk perception is closer to the observation of misconduct reported by employees. At larger firms, decision makers feel less in control and hence have a heightened perception of risk.
  2. The observation of misconduct reported by employees will inherently underestimate the actual incidence of misconduct due to employees' limited access to information and misunderstanding of what constitutes misconduct. Consequently, the risk perceptions of the decision makers should be expected to be higher to match the actual incidence and to factor in lower tolerance of misconduct. The fact that decision makers at smaller companies have lower risk perception may be because of poor understanding or higher tolerance of breaches than the decision makers at larger companies.

Risk Management Training Presentation

About the UK Corporate Compliance Survey

Skillcast is the leading provider of corporate compliance e-learning and tools to companies in the UK, ranging from FTSE100 giants to small and mid-sized businesses. Given our passion for staff compliance, we commissioned two surveys to assess compliance issues, attitudes and perceptions in the UK corporate workplace.

Our survey was conducted in May 2019 in partnership with YouGov, gathering the opinions of 2,000 employees and 2,000 decision makers. Find more survey results in the Compliance Insights section of our blog.

Feel free to add your thoughts/opinions in the comment section below.

Compliance Essentials

Our comprehensive off-the-shelf compliance solution of 30+ in-depth courses and dozens of microlearning modules helps companies from SMEs to global corporates to achieve compliance success.

Start a Free Trial

cta-banner-placeholder