<img src="https://certify.alexametrics.com/atrk.gif?account=b2hlr1ah9W20em" style="display:none" height="1" width="1" alt="">
    Get started

    The Risk Perception and Employee Misconduct Gap

    Published on 15 Aug 2019 by Vivek Dodd

    A recent Skillcast survey has highlighted the significant gap between the incidence of misconduct observed by employees at UK firms, and the risk perception of decision makers. 

    Key finding

    From our UK Corporate Compliance Survey in May 2019,  which covered 4,000 employees and decision makers at UK firms, we observed a significant gap between the incidence of misconduct observed by employees and the risk perception of decision makers. And notably this gap widens the larger the size of the company.

    Misconduct observed by UK company employees

    In survey, we asked employees at UK companies if they had witnessed any of the common acts of employee misconduct in the past twelve months. The responses (see Figure 1) revealed that:

    • The vast majority (67%) had not witnessed any act of misconduct in the workplace
    • Health & safety, and discrimination & harassment breaches were by far the most common examples of misconduct witnessed
    • Personal data & IT security breaches and fraud were cited by a tiny minority
    • Instances of money laundering, sanctions, bribery & corruption, competition law/collusion were practically insignificant


    Risk perception of UK company decision makers

    To the decision makers at UK companies, we put the question slightly differently. We asked them what acts of employee misconduct they fear most in their business. The responses (see Figure 2) revealed that:

    • The risk perceptions of decision makers were a lot higher but the profile matched the risks being reported by employees
    • 40% of the decision makers reported not being at risk of employee misconduct in their business - this figure ranged between 15% at larger firms, 26% at medium sized firms and 65% at small firms
    • As with employees, Health & safety, and discrimination & harassment risks also figured highly with the decision makers
    • But, unlike employees, the decision makers have an equally high threat perception from personal data & IT security breaches and fraud
    • Decision makers perceive the risk of money laundering, sanctions, bribery & corruption, competition law/collusion to be lower but still very significant


    The gap between incidence and perceptions of misconduct

    The above findings show that overall, decision makers have a far higher risk perception than the incidence of misconduct observed by employees (see Figure 3).


    The incidence of misconduct observed by employees is relatively unchanged irrespective of the company size (see Figure 4).


    However, the risk perception of the decision makers is vastly different, with those at large firms significantly more worried about employee misconduct than those as smaller firms.


    Consequently, the difference between incidence observed by employees and the risk perception of the decision makers is far wider at large and medium sized firms.




    Why is the gap between observation and perceptions of misconduct greater at larger companies?

    This discrepancy between small, medium and large firms above is significant and based on the results of polling over 2,000 employees and 2,000 decision makers. Making sense of it though is open to conjecture. A multitude of factors could be at play. We propose two premises below and invite you to add others based on your own experience.

    1. Decision makers at smaller firms feel more in control of the actions of their employees and hence their risk perception is closer to the observation of misconduct reported by employees. At larger firms, decision makers feel less in control and hence have a heightened perception of risk.
    2. The observation of misconduct reported by employees will inherently underestimate the actual incidence of misconduct due to employees' limited access to information and misunderstanding of what constitutes misconduct. Consequently, the risk perceptions of the decision makers should be expected to be higher to match the actual incidence and to factor in lower tolerance of misconduct. The fact that decision makers at smaller companies have lower risk perception may be because of poor understanding or higher tolerance of breaches than the decision makers at larger companies.

    About the UK Corporate Compliance Survey

    Skillcast is the leading provider of corporate compliance e-learning and tools to companies in the UK, ranging from FTSE100 giants to small and mid-sized businesses. Given our passion for staff compliance, we commissioned two surveys to assess compliance issues, attitudes and perceptions in the UK corporate workplace.

    Our UK Corporate Compliance Survey  gathered the opinions of 2,000 employees and 2,000 decision makers, the fieldwork was conducted in May 2019 in partnership with YouGov.

    Feel free to add your thoughts/opinions in the comment section below.

    Leave a comment


    Free Trial: Compliance Essentials

    Skillcast Essentials is our best-selling library and there's a reason for that. Essentials library provides comprehensive coverage of the key compliance / conduct issues that companies in the UK face today.

    Request now

    What are the Best Workplace Learning Theories?

    Learning theories have been developing for decades, each has their own merits. We look at six of the most well established theories to explain how you can use them to improve outcomes. When designing ...

    Read More
    Biggest GDPR Fines of 2019

    Penalties for breaching the GDPR can reach up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover, whichever is highest. We examine the size and reasons for the biggest GDPR fines of 2019. Ever since ...

    Read More
    Highest FCA Fines of 2019

    The FCA issued a record total of £392 million in fines in 2019. In fact, the two largest fines in 2019 were larger than the 2018 totals. We've analysed they key corporate and individual fines in ...

    Read More
    Why a Blended Approach Drives Engagement & Learning Outcomes

    It is critical that you provide training that engages your learners, but should that be face-to-face, e-learning, mentoring or something else? We explain how to blend for success... Whilst compliance ...

    Read More